The Riemann Hypothesis has been around a long

time, and I come along saying I can prove it, and of course nobody believes a word of

it – old man etc. And you can read yesterday’s Times and there’s a big article about me

which I’m rather cross about, but it says more or less ‘crazy old man thinks he’s

solved the Riemann Hypothesis ha ha ha’, but not quite as badly as that, but in Times

speak. And the point is I have solved it, so I’m certain as certain can be that I’ve

got this problem fully tied up here and moreover, unlike people searching, I wasn’t even looking

for the problem, I was trying to do something different.

That’s exactly what I was going to ask, where was that moment when you realized that

your work could, because you were looking at the…

The Fine-Structure Constant – a fundamental problem in physics.

So how did you go from that and suddenly think ‘ooh this could work with Riemann’? How

did that happen? Well it’s a complicated story, of course

I did actually say something about the Riemann Hypothesis a few years back. But what I said

then, it’s still true what I think now, which is (a). I can prove the Riemann Hypothesis

and (b). the Riemann Hypothesis is not true. Now that seems contradictory but if you know

your Godel it’s not. It means you can prove the Riemann Hypothesis with a certain set

of axioms, and with more axioms you can prove another Riemann Hypothesis, but you can’t

prove all of them all of the time. Eventually God says ‘ne plus ultra’ – you’ve reached

the end of the road, you can’t get there, the Riemann Hypothesis is out of bounds. And

that’s the real story. But on the way, I proved the Riemann Hypothesis except I proved

it upside down, people usually want to wait until they’ve got the end of the road and

look back and tell all of the Riemann Hypothesis’ they could have done. I start at the beginning

of the road, I choose the first Riemann Hypothesis I come to, the one that Riemann came to and

I solved it. Okay, what’s the great big deal? There are still many more Riemann Hypothesis

in front, the next road there’ll be another one – a more general one, and another more

general one – I’ll take them one at a time.

So that’s your plan you’re going to go for the other ones?

I think after a while I’ll hand them over to the youngsters. I’ve done the first few

, you see how it goes , just carry it on in the same way – and more or less that’s

correct – so yes, the first step is the one that counts – there’s a good French phrase

for that ‘la premiere etape qui compte’ so the first step is actually, you know, the

most dramatic step you take. So, you gave this outline of the proof in

your lecture and then are you – I assume you’re planning to sort of write this up fully or

is it already available the full proof or will this be coming over the next few weeks?

The full proof is available in the following sense – you read my short paper which is

only 5 pages. I read it this morning yes.

And you read my paper on the Fine-Structure Constant which is about 15 pages. Those between

them contain the whole proof. Okay.

Now you may not be smart enough to understand that and most people say “I don’t follow

it at all”, but it’s there, but I’m going to write another paper. But that will

be the best proof and I will say look if Riemann were here now, I would say “look – yes of

course, I knew it all the time, what’s all the fuss about?”

You got to sit down with him? So badass! Keep up the awesomeness =)

Can't imagine how you got this interview?!?!?

GRİGORİ PERALMAN don't let it hear

Professor Gabriel Audu Oyibo solved this in 1990. In fact all the so-called 7 unsolvable by Clay Math are solved by Oyibo's GAGUT. Gij,j=0. They know this in Gottingen (Gauss head quarters) Too much ostrich in the sand postures, for obvious reasons.

2/6

But, of course, I was very, very drunk.

You shouldn't be promoting this.

I love you Michael Atiyah!

Subtitles. Please.

This is sad. You shouldn’t indulge his

delusions. He’s speaking nonsense.

Stop spreading this stupid bullshit! Earth is flat and only GOD can judge!

He didn't prove it.

Gij,j=0

What? Gabriel A. Oyibo: Grand Unified Theorem (NR. 26 – center) on a GAUSS year 2005 event in Goettingen

Atiya is of the great scientist ever and real genious if he proved it or not it doesnt matter..

Tom Crawford – You should feel ashamed you played along with him. Sir Michael OBVIOUSLY has issues and you indulge him for personal benefit and upload it instead of being honest.

You should feel very very ashamed of yourself.

Rest in Peace, Sir Atiyah

RIP

"I do not know what I may appear to the world, but to myself I seem to have been only like a boy playing on the seashore, and diverting myself in now and then finding a smoother pebble or a prettier shell than ordinary, whilst the great ocean of truth lay all undiscovered before me."

— Sir Isaac Newton, FRS (1642 – 1727)

Rest In Peace, Sir Michael.

RIP professor you were amazing

RIP Atiyah, thanks for all

Atiyah must have read my paper since Todd function would be T = 1/lnP^2^n , P is prime and 1 = W/s , s is roots of zeta